Inconsistent Result

[kurtwest]

Batchpatch is returning different results than if i run a command on the server itself. I am checking servers to see if SMBv1.

I have tried a PS script and sc.exe and I have the same results. Batchpathc says SMBv1 is not enabled, but the server locally says other wise.

I have tried Local and Remote command and SYSTEM and Elevated Token.

[kurtwest]

Here is example. Notice the different. I have double checked I am dealing with same server.

Batchpatch:
Local Command 1
sc.exe qc lanmanworkstation
Local Command Output Log
[SC] QueryServiceConfig SUCCESS

SERVICE_NAME: lanmanworkstation
TYPE : 20 WIN32_SHARE_PROCESS
START_TYPE : 2 AUTO_START
ERROR_CONTROL : 1 NORMAL
BINARY_PATH_NAME : C:\WINDOWS\System32\svchost.exe -k NetworkService -p
LOAD_ORDER_GROUP : NetworkProvider
TAG : 0
DISPLAY_NAME : Workstation
DEPENDENCIES : Bowser
: MRxSmb20
: NSI
SERVICE_START_NAME : NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService

Local CMD:
sc.exe qc lanmanworkstation
[SC] QueryServiceConfig SUCCESS

SERVICE_NAME: lanmanworkstation
TYPE : 20 WIN32_SHARE_PROCESS
START_TYPE : 2 AUTO_START
ERROR_CONTROL : 1 NORMAL
BINARY_PATH_NAME : C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k NetworkService
LOAD_ORDER_GROUP : NetworkProvider
TAG : 0
DISPLAY_NAME : Workstation
DEPENDENCIES : Bowser
: MRxSmb10
: MRxSmb20
: NSI
SERVICE_START_NAME : NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService

[doug]

BatchPatch local command runs the command on the BatchPatch computer, not the target computer. BatchPatch remote command runs the command on the target computer. So, you’re comparing the results from the BatchPatch computer to the target computer instead of target computer to target computer.

[kurtwest]

Ok? I had that completely backwards.

[doug]

No worries. The “local” is local to the computer where you’re running BP. I totally understand how you could interpret it in the opposite way.

[Author]

Posts